TY - JOUR
T1 - Two cases of renovascular hypertension and ischemic renal dysfunction
T2 - Reliable choice of examinations and treatments
AU - Ando, Katsuyuki
AU - Takahashi, Katsutoshi
AU - Shibata, Shigeru
AU - Matsui, Hiromitsu
AU - Fujita, Megumi
AU - Shibagaki, Yugo
AU - Shimosawa, Tatsuo
AU - Isshiki, Masashi
AU - Fujita, Toshiro
PY - 2004/12
Y1 - 2004/12
N2 - We experienced two aged patients with atherosclerotic renovascular stenosis associated with hypertension and ischemic nephropathy. Both patients exhibited sudden rise in blood pressure (BP) and progressive aggravation of renal dysfunction. In these patients, the use of contrast medium to screen for renal artery stenosis (RAS) ran the risk of further deterioration of renal function. We therefore used magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), which is less conducive to renal damage, to screen for RAS. One-sided RAS was treated by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the renal artery (PTRA) and stenting. As a result, BP decreased in both patients. Serum creatinine (Cr) decreased slightly in one patient, whereas, in the other, serum Cr increased transiently and then decreased and stabilized to pre-treatment levels. Thus, although it is unclear whether the combination of PTRA and stenting is among the best treatments for patients with RAS and moderate-to-severe renal dysfunction, PTRA and stenting are clearly of benefit in selected patients. In addition, recent progress in characterizing the pathophysiology of ischemic nephropathy associated with renovascular hypertension has created interest in the therapeutic potential of angiotensin II receptor antagonists, sympatholytic agents, and antioxidants. Therefore, we discuss the therapeutic utility of PTRA and stenting and the above-mentioned medications in patients with RAS and renal dysfunction.
AB - We experienced two aged patients with atherosclerotic renovascular stenosis associated with hypertension and ischemic nephropathy. Both patients exhibited sudden rise in blood pressure (BP) and progressive aggravation of renal dysfunction. In these patients, the use of contrast medium to screen for renal artery stenosis (RAS) ran the risk of further deterioration of renal function. We therefore used magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), which is less conducive to renal damage, to screen for RAS. One-sided RAS was treated by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the renal artery (PTRA) and stenting. As a result, BP decreased in both patients. Serum creatinine (Cr) decreased slightly in one patient, whereas, in the other, serum Cr increased transiently and then decreased and stabilized to pre-treatment levels. Thus, although it is unclear whether the combination of PTRA and stenting is among the best treatments for patients with RAS and moderate-to-severe renal dysfunction, PTRA and stenting are clearly of benefit in selected patients. In addition, recent progress in characterizing the pathophysiology of ischemic nephropathy associated with renovascular hypertension has created interest in the therapeutic potential of angiotensin II receptor antagonists, sympatholytic agents, and antioxidants. Therefore, we discuss the therapeutic utility of PTRA and stenting and the above-mentioned medications in patients with RAS and renal dysfunction.
KW - Magnetic resonance angiography
KW - Oxidative stress
KW - Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the renal artery
KW - Renin-angiotensin system
KW - Sympathetic nervous system
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=15844384634&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1291/hypres.27.985
DO - 10.1291/hypres.27.985
M3 - 記事
C2 - 15894840
AN - SCOPUS:15844384634
SN - 0916-9636
VL - 27
SP - 985
EP - 992
JO - Hypertension Research
JF - Hypertension Research
IS - 12
ER -