TY - JOUR
T1 - Prospective randomized study of endoscopic biliary stone extraction using either a basket or a balloon catheter
T2 - the BasketBall study
AU - Ozawa, Noritaka
AU - Yasuda, Ichiro
AU - Doi, Shinpei
AU - Iwashita, Takuji
AU - Shimizu, Masahito
AU - Mukai, Tsuyoshi
AU - Nakashima, Masanori
AU - Ban, Tesshin
AU - Kojima, Issei
AU - Matsuda, Koichiro
AU - Matsuda, Mitsuru
AU - Ishida, Yusuke
AU - Okabe, Yoshinobu
AU - Ando, Nobuhiro
AU - Iwata, Keisuke
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Japanese Society of Gastroenterology.
PY - 2017/5/1
Y1 - 2017/5/1
N2 - Background: In Japan and Europe, a retrieval basket is generally used for endoscopic extraction of bile duct stones, while in the US, a retrieval balloon is mainly used. However, the efficacies of these two devices have not been previously compared. Therefore, the present multicenter, prospective, randomized study was performed to compare the efficacies of these two devices for endoscopic biliary stone extraction. Methods: This study was designed as a non-inferiority study in comparing a basket removal with a balloon removal. Six Japanese institutions participated in this study, which included 184 patients with bile duct stones <11 mm in diameter with no limitation in the number of stones. The stones were identified and measured during ERCP, after which the patients were randomly assigned to undergo endoscopic stone extraction using either a basket catheter or a balloon catheter. The primary end point was the rate of complete removals of stones within 10 min, and the secondary end point was the rate of procedure-related complications. Results: There were 91 patients in the basket group and 93 in the balloon group. The rate of successful stone extraction within 10 min was 81.3 % (74/91) in the basket group and 83.9 % (78/93) in the balloon group (p = 0.7000). The complication rate was 6.6 % in the basket group and 11.8 % in the balloon group (p = 0.3092). Complications included bleeding, pancreatitis, and cholangitis. Conclusions: Basket and balloon catheters showed similar efficacies for endoscopic biliary stone extraction when stone size is 11 mm or smaller.
AB - Background: In Japan and Europe, a retrieval basket is generally used for endoscopic extraction of bile duct stones, while in the US, a retrieval balloon is mainly used. However, the efficacies of these two devices have not been previously compared. Therefore, the present multicenter, prospective, randomized study was performed to compare the efficacies of these two devices for endoscopic biliary stone extraction. Methods: This study was designed as a non-inferiority study in comparing a basket removal with a balloon removal. Six Japanese institutions participated in this study, which included 184 patients with bile duct stones <11 mm in diameter with no limitation in the number of stones. The stones were identified and measured during ERCP, after which the patients were randomly assigned to undergo endoscopic stone extraction using either a basket catheter or a balloon catheter. The primary end point was the rate of complete removals of stones within 10 min, and the secondary end point was the rate of procedure-related complications. Results: There were 91 patients in the basket group and 93 in the balloon group. The rate of successful stone extraction within 10 min was 81.3 % (74/91) in the basket group and 83.9 % (78/93) in the balloon group (p = 0.7000). The complication rate was 6.6 % in the basket group and 11.8 % in the balloon group (p = 0.3092). Complications included bleeding, pancreatitis, and cholangitis. Conclusions: Basket and balloon catheters showed similar efficacies for endoscopic biliary stone extraction when stone size is 11 mm or smaller.
KW - Balloon catheter
KW - Basket catheter
KW - Biliary stone
KW - Endoscopic extraction
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84986275802
U2 - 10.1007/s00535-016-1257-2
DO - 10.1007/s00535-016-1257-2
M3 - 記事
C2 - 27631594
AN - SCOPUS:84986275802
SN - 0944-1174
VL - 52
SP - 623
EP - 630
JO - Journal of Gastroenterology
JF - Journal of Gastroenterology
IS - 5
ER -