TY - JOUR
T1 - Prenatal MR imaging diagnosis of placental invasion
AU - Noda, Yoshifumi
AU - Kanematsu, Masayuki
AU - Goshima, Satoshi
AU - Kondo, Hiroshi
AU - Watanabe, Haruo
AU - Kawada, Hiroshi
AU - Kawai, Nobuyuki
AU - Tanahashi, Yukichi
AU - Furui, Tatsuro
AU - Morishige, Ken ichirou
AU - Bae, Kyongtae T.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
PY - 2015/10/25
Y1 - 2015/10/25
N2 - Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the characteristic imaging features and performance of prenatal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the diagnosis of placental invasion. Methods: This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board and written informed consent was waived. Twenty-eight patients (age range 26–39 years; mean age, 33.8 ± 3.1 years) with suspected placental invasion underwent prenatal MR imaging, including 7 patients with placental invasion and 21 without. Two radiologists assessed the presence of seven previously described MR imaging findings associated with placental invasion. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were calculated. The diagnostic performance was also determined by a receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis. Results: Three MR imaging findings (uterine bulging, heterogeneous signal intensity in the placenta on T2-weighted images, and hypointense intraplacental bands on T2-weighted images) were significantly more common in patients with placental invasion than in those without (P = 0.020–0.023). The presence of at least two of these three imaging findings yielded a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of 100, 86, 67, 95, and 89%, respectively. Conclusions: The presence of at least two of the three characteristic prenatal MR imaging findings strongly supports a diagnosis of placental invasion.
AB - Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the characteristic imaging features and performance of prenatal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the diagnosis of placental invasion. Methods: This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board and written informed consent was waived. Twenty-eight patients (age range 26–39 years; mean age, 33.8 ± 3.1 years) with suspected placental invasion underwent prenatal MR imaging, including 7 patients with placental invasion and 21 without. Two radiologists assessed the presence of seven previously described MR imaging findings associated with placental invasion. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were calculated. The diagnostic performance was also determined by a receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis. Results: Three MR imaging findings (uterine bulging, heterogeneous signal intensity in the placenta on T2-weighted images, and hypointense intraplacental bands on T2-weighted images) were significantly more common in patients with placental invasion than in those without (P = 0.020–0.023). The presence of at least two of these three imaging findings yielded a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of 100, 86, 67, 95, and 89%, respectively. Conclusions: The presence of at least two of the three characteristic prenatal MR imaging findings strongly supports a diagnosis of placental invasion.
KW - Heterogeneous signal intensity
KW - Hypointense intraplacental band
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Placental invasion
KW - Uterine bulging
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84930182896
U2 - 10.1007/s00261-014-0281-z
DO - 10.1007/s00261-014-0281-z
M3 - 記事
C2 - 25343943
AN - SCOPUS:84930182896
SN - 0942-8925
VL - 40
SP - 1273
EP - 1278
JO - Abdominal Imaging
JF - Abdominal Imaging
IS - 5
ER -