Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Masked hypertension in diabetes mellitus: Treatment implications for clinical practice

  • Stanley S. Franklin
  • , Lutgarde Thijs
  • , Yan Li
  • , Tine W. Hansen
  • , José Boggia
  • , Yanping Liu
  • , Kei Asayama
  • , Kristina Björklund-Bodegård
  • , Takayoshi Ohkubo
  • , Jørgen Jeppesen
  • , Christian Torp-Pedersen
  • , Eamon Dolan
  • , Tatiana Kuznetsova
  • , Katarzyna Stolarz-Skrzypek
  • , Valérie Tikhonoff
  • , Sofia Malyutina
  • , Edoardo Casiglia
  • , Yuri Nikitin
  • , Lars Lind
  • , Edgardo Sandoya
  • Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz, Jan Filipovský, Yutaka Imai, Jiguang Wang, Hans Ibsen, Eoin O'Brien, Jan A. Staessen
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • KU Leuven
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  • Novo Nordisk Foundation
  • Dept Cardiol
  • Universidad de la República
  • Tohoku University
  • Uppsala University
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Novosibirsk State Medical University
  • Jagiellonian University Medical College
  • University of Padua
  • Asociación Espan. Ola Primera de Socorros Mutuos
  • Charles University
  • Aarhus University
  • University College Dublin
  • Maastricht University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

166 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although distinguishing features of masked hypertension in diabetics are well known, the significance of antihypertensive treatment on clinical practice decisions has not been fully explored. We analyzed 9691 subjects from the population-based 11-country International Database on Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes. Prevalence of masked hypertension in untreated normotensive participants was higher (P<0.0001) among 229 diabetics (29.3%, n=67) than among 5486 nondiabetics (18.8%, n=1031). Over a median of 11.0 years of follow-up, the adjusted risk for a composite cardiovascular end point in untreated diabetic-masked hypertensives tended to be higher than in normotensives (hazard rate [HR], 1.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-3.97; P=0.059), similar to untreated stage 1 hypertensives (HR, 1.07; CI, 0.58-1.98; P=0.82), but less than stage 2 hypertensives (HR, 0.53; CI, 0.29-0.99; P=0.048). In contrast, cardiovascular risk was not significantly different in antihypertensive-treated diabetic-masked hypertensives, as compared with the normotensive comparator group (HR, 1.13; CI, 0.54-2.35; P=0.75), stage 1 hypertensives (HR, 0.91; CI, 0.49-1.69; P=0.76), and stage 2 hypertensives (HR, 0.65; CI, 0.35-1.20; P=0.17). In the untreated diabetic-masked hypertensive population, mean conventional systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 129.2±8.0/76.0±7.3 mm Hg, and mean daytime systolic/diastolic blood pressure 141.5±9.1/83.7±6.5 mm Hg. In conclusion, masked hypertension occurred in 29% of untreated diabetics, had comparable cardiovascular risk as stage 1 hypertension, and would require considerable reduction in conventional blood pressure to reach daytime ambulatory treatment goal. Importantly, many hypertensive diabetics when receiving antihypertensive therapy can present with normalized conventional and elevated ambulatory blood pressure that mimics masked hypertension.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)964-971
Number of pages8
JournalHypertension
Volume61
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2013
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • ambulatory blood pressure
  • conventional blood pressure
  • diabetes mellitus
  • masked hypertension
  • population study

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Masked hypertension in diabetes mellitus: Treatment implications for clinical practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this