Determining optimal length of coracoid graft in the modified Bristow procedure for anterior shoulder instability: A three-dimensional finite element analysis

Hirotaka Sano, Tatsuro Komatsuda, Kazuhide Suzuki, Hiroo Abe, Hiroshi Ozawa, Jun Kumagai, Toshimitsu A. Yokobori

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus concerning the coracoid graft length in the modified Bristow procedure. OBJECTIVE: We attempted to determine the optimal graft length using the three-dimensional finite element method. METHODS: In a shoulder model with a 25% anterior glenoid defect, a coracoid graft of varying lengths (5, 10, 15, and 20 mm) was fixed using a half-Threaded screw. First, a compressive load of 500 N was applied to the screw head to determine the graft failure load during screw tightening. Next, a tensile load (200 N) was applied to the graft to determine the failure load due to biceps muscle traction. RESULTS: In the screw compression, the failure loads in the 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-mm models were 252, 370, 377, and 331 N, respectively. In the tensile load applied to the coracoid graft, the failure load exceeded 200 N for both the 5-and 10-mm models. CONCLUSION: The 5-mm graft had a high risk of fracture during intraoperative screw tightening. As for the biceps muscle traction, the 5-and 10-mm-grafts had a lower failure risk than the 15-and 20-mm-grafts. Therefore, we believe that the optimal length of the coracoid graft is 10 mm in the modified Bristow procedure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-75
Number of pages11
JournalBio-Medical Materials and Engineering
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 4 Jan 2024

Keywords

  • anterior shoulder instability
  • compressive force
  • Coracoid graft length
  • failure load
  • modified Bristow procedure
  • tensile stress

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Determining optimal length of coracoid graft in the modified Bristow procedure for anterior shoulder instability: A three-dimensional finite element analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this