Clinical Types and Outcomes of Panic Disorder

Tatsuo Takeuchi; Ryosuke Hayashi; Toyomi Nemoto; Masahiko Hasegawa; Gakujin Tomiyama; Masatoshi Ikeda; Hisashi Hanazawa

doi:10.1111/j.1440-1819.1994.tb03081.x

Clinical Types and Outcomes of Panic Disorder

Tatsuo Takeuchi, Ryosuke Hayashi, Toyomi Nemoto, Masahiko Hasegawa, Gakujin Tomiyama, Masatoshi Ikeda, Hisashi Hanazawa

Faculty of Liberal Arts

Teikyo University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Abstract: Two hundred and ten subjects with panic disorder were studied and classified into four clinical types according to symptomatology and clinical courses. The outcomes of 181 of these subjects were categorized in three ways (good, fair, or poor). Through an examination of the relationship between these clinical types and categories of outcome, it was found that the subjects with little or no “neurotization” had a favorable outcome, while those with remarkable “neurotization” or with comorbid depressive states had an unfavorable outcome. It is suggested that concomitant “neurotic” symptoms, such as somatoform symptoms, as well as concomitance of depressive states, predict an unfavorable outcome of panic disorder.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	801-805
Number of pages	5
Journal	Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Volume	48
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1819.1994.tb03081.x
State	Published - Dec 1994

Keywords

clinical types
comorbid depression
neurotization
outcomes
panic disorder

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1440-1819.1994.tb03081.x

Cite this

@article{ced3e34a10544a9488152d1a67759127,

title = "Clinical Types and Outcomes of Panic Disorder",

abstract = "Abstract: Two hundred and ten subjects with panic disorder were studied and classified into four clinical types according to symptomatology and clinical courses. The outcomes of 181 of these subjects were categorized in three ways (good, fair, or poor). Through an examination of the relationship between these clinical types and categories of outcome, it was found that the subjects with little or no “neurotization” had a favorable outcome, while those with remarkable “neurotization” or with comorbid depressive states had an unfavorable outcome. It is suggested that concomitant “neurotic” symptoms, such as somatoform symptoms, as well as concomitance of depressive states, predict an unfavorable outcome of panic disorder.",

keywords = "clinical types, comorbid depression, neurotization, outcomes, panic disorder",

author = "Tatsuo Takeuchi and Ryosuke Hayashi and Toyomi Nemoto and Masahiko Hasegawa and Gakujin Tomiyama and Masatoshi Ikeda and Hisashi Hanazawa",

year = "1994",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1111/j.1440-1819.1994.tb03081.x",

language = "英語",

volume = "48",

pages = "801--805",

journal = "Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences",

issn = "1323-1316",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical Types and Outcomes of Panic Disorder

AU - Takeuchi, Tatsuo

AU - Hayashi, Ryosuke

AU - Nemoto, Toyomi

AU - Hasegawa, Masahiko

AU - Tomiyama, Gakujin

AU - Ikeda, Masatoshi

AU - Hanazawa, Hisashi

PY - 1994/12

Y1 - 1994/12

N2 - Abstract: Two hundred and ten subjects with panic disorder were studied and classified into four clinical types according to symptomatology and clinical courses. The outcomes of 181 of these subjects were categorized in three ways (good, fair, or poor). Through an examination of the relationship between these clinical types and categories of outcome, it was found that the subjects with little or no “neurotization” had a favorable outcome, while those with remarkable “neurotization” or with comorbid depressive states had an unfavorable outcome. It is suggested that concomitant “neurotic” symptoms, such as somatoform symptoms, as well as concomitance of depressive states, predict an unfavorable outcome of panic disorder.

AB - Abstract: Two hundred and ten subjects with panic disorder were studied and classified into four clinical types according to symptomatology and clinical courses. The outcomes of 181 of these subjects were categorized in three ways (good, fair, or poor). Through an examination of the relationship between these clinical types and categories of outcome, it was found that the subjects with little or no “neurotization” had a favorable outcome, while those with remarkable “neurotization” or with comorbid depressive states had an unfavorable outcome. It is suggested that concomitant “neurotic” symptoms, such as somatoform symptoms, as well as concomitance of depressive states, predict an unfavorable outcome of panic disorder.

KW - clinical types

KW - comorbid depression

KW - neurotization

KW - outcomes

KW - panic disorder

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0028608062

U2 - 10.1111/j.1440-1819.1994.tb03081.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1440-1819.1994.tb03081.x

M3 - 記事

AN - SCOPUS:0028608062

SN - 1323-1316

VL - 48

SP - 801

EP - 805

JO - Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

JF - Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

IS - 4

ER -

Clinical Types and Outcomes of Panic Disorder

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this