Blocking antibody is generated in allergic rhinitis patients during specific immunotherapy using standardized Japanese cedar pollen extract.

Ayako Kawakami, Rikiya Koketsu, Maho Suzukawa, Mizuho Nagao, Yukiko Hiraguchi, Reiko Tokuda, Takao Fujisawa, Hiroyuki Nagase, Ken Ohta, Kazuhiko Yamamoto, Masao Yamaguchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Japanese cedar pollen is by far the most important cause of allergic rhinitis in Japan. In this study, we assessed the induction of blocking antibody during specific immunotherapy (SIT) using a recently standardized allergen extract from Japanese cedar pollen. METHODS: Basophils from nonallergic subjects were passively sensitized with serum samples prepared from pollinosis patients before and after SIT; all patients showed good clinical efficacy. The cells were then stimulated with the standardized allergen, and histamine release was measured. In most experiments, the basophil stimulation buffer contained 1% serum. RESULTS: Pollinosis patients' sera obtained both before and after SIT showed essentially similar sensitizing capacity for basophils. Basophil degranulation in response to a relatively low concentration of pollen extract was effectively suppressed by addition of post-SIT serum samples, indicating the presence of blocking antibody. The blocking antibody was IgG, and its potency varied widely among the donor patients. CONCLUSIONS: The standardized allergen extract from Japanese cedar pollen is useful not only for clinical application in SIT, but also for testing for induction of blocking antibody during SIT.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54-60
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Archives of Allergy and Immunology
Volume146 Suppl 1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Blocking antibody is generated in allergic rhinitis patients during specific immunotherapy using standardized Japanese cedar pollen extract.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this