TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of locomotive syndrome in patients with visceral cancer, the comparison with non-cancer patients using propensity score matching
AU - Sato, Masashi
AU - Furuya, Takeo
AU - Shiga, Yasuhiro
AU - Maki, Satoshi
AU - Takaoka, Hiromitsu
AU - Miyamoto, Takuya
AU - Kitamura, Mitsuhiro
AU - Abe, Koki
AU - Saito, Junya
AU - Fujimoto, Kazuki
AU - Iijima, Yasushi
AU - Orita, Sumihisa
AU - Yamaguchi, Satoshi
AU - Inage, Kazuhide
AU - Kishida, Shunji
AU - Yamashita, Takeshi
AU - Sasho, Takahisa
AU - Shiko, Yuki
AU - Kawasaki, Yohei
AU - Kawano, Hirotaka
AU - Ohtori, Seiji
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Background: When treating cancer patients, the progression of symptoms is accompanied by the deterioration of systemic conditions and motor function. From a risk-benefit perspective, a certain level of physical function must be maintained to continue cancer treatment. Recently, outpatient cancer treatment has become more common. Motor function is important to determine the feasibility of continuing cancer treatment. The study aimed to evaluate the motor function of patients with visceral cancer using locomo tests established by Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Methods: Locomo tests were performed, and the results were compared with data from non-cancer individuals. Background data were matched by propensity score matching. Data from 53 cancer patients (group C) were compared with that of 75 non-cancer patients (group N). Results: The average score in the two-step test of group C was lower than that of group N (1.27: 1.37, p = 0.004). The average function in the stand-up test of group C was worse than that of group N (p = 0.001). The average score in the 25-question geriatric locomotive function scale (GLFS) of group C was significantly higher than that of group N (19.92: 5.29, SE 2.21, p < 0.001). Higher 25-question GLFS scores indicate reduced mobility. The proportion of the locomo stage 2 in group C was significantly higher than in group N (51%: 13%, p < 0.001). The results of the two field tests revealed a clinically minimal difference between the two groups, but a statistically significant difference. Locomo tests may be detect potential motor dysfunction in outpatient cancer patients with apparently maintained motor function. Conclusions: Even in cancer patients who attend outpatient clinics, their motor functions could be potentially impaired. Therapeutic interventions to maintain and enhance motor function for cancer patients could be useful for continuing cancer treatment, and furthermore, improving prognosis.
AB - Background: When treating cancer patients, the progression of symptoms is accompanied by the deterioration of systemic conditions and motor function. From a risk-benefit perspective, a certain level of physical function must be maintained to continue cancer treatment. Recently, outpatient cancer treatment has become more common. Motor function is important to determine the feasibility of continuing cancer treatment. The study aimed to evaluate the motor function of patients with visceral cancer using locomo tests established by Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Methods: Locomo tests were performed, and the results were compared with data from non-cancer individuals. Background data were matched by propensity score matching. Data from 53 cancer patients (group C) were compared with that of 75 non-cancer patients (group N). Results: The average score in the two-step test of group C was lower than that of group N (1.27: 1.37, p = 0.004). The average function in the stand-up test of group C was worse than that of group N (p = 0.001). The average score in the 25-question geriatric locomotive function scale (GLFS) of group C was significantly higher than that of group N (19.92: 5.29, SE 2.21, p < 0.001). Higher 25-question GLFS scores indicate reduced mobility. The proportion of the locomo stage 2 in group C was significantly higher than in group N (51%: 13%, p < 0.001). The results of the two field tests revealed a clinically minimal difference between the two groups, but a statistically significant difference. Locomo tests may be detect potential motor dysfunction in outpatient cancer patients with apparently maintained motor function. Conclusions: Even in cancer patients who attend outpatient clinics, their motor functions could be potentially impaired. Therapeutic interventions to maintain and enhance motor function for cancer patients could be useful for continuing cancer treatment, and furthermore, improving prognosis.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85113315269
U2 - 10.1016/j.jos.2021.07.018
DO - 10.1016/j.jos.2021.07.018
M3 - 記事
C2 - 34420843
AN - SCOPUS:85113315269
SN - 0949-2658
VL - 27
SP - 1328
EP - 1332
JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Science
JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Science
IS - 6
ER -