A questionnaire survey on evaluation for penetration and compliance of the Japanese Guideline on Febrile Neutropenia among hematology-oncology physicians and surgeons

Nobu Akiyama, Takuho Okamura, Minoru Yoshida, Shun ichi Kimura, Shingo Yano, Isao Yoshida, Hiroyuki Kusaba, Kosuke Takahashi, Hiroyuki Fujita, Keitaro Fukushima, Hiromichi Iwasaki, Kazuo Tamura, Toshiaki Saeki, Yasushi Takamatsu, Sadamoto Zenda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: The Japanese Society of Medical Oncology published a guideline (GL) on febrile neutropenia (FN) in 2017. The study’s purpose is to reveal how widely GL penetrated among physicians and surgeons providing chemotherapy. Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted with SurveyMonkey™ for members of the Japanese Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and relevant academic organizations. Each question had four options (always do, do in more than half of patients, do in less than half, do not at all) and a free description form. Responses were analyzed with statistical text-analytics. Result: A total of 800 responses were retrieved. Major respondents were experts with more than 10-year experience, physicians 54%, and surgeons 46%. Eighty-seven percent of respondents knew and used GL. Forty-eight percent assessed FN with Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) score “always” or “more than half.” Eighty-one percent chose beta-lactam monotherapy as primary treatment in high-risk patients. Seventy-seven percent did oral antibacterial therapy in low-risk patients ambulatorily. Seventy-eight percent administered primary prophylactic G-CSF (ppG-CSF) in FN frequency ≥ 20% regimen. Fifty-nine percent did ppG-CSF for high-risk patients in FN frequency 10–20% regimen. Ninety-seven percent did not use ppG-CSF in FN frequency < 10% regimen. The medians of complete and complete plus partial compliance rates were 46.4% (range 7.0–92.8) and 77.8% (range 35.4–98.7). The complete compliance rates were less than 30% in seven recommendations, including the MASCC score assessment. Conclusion: GL is estimated to be widely utilized, but some recommendations were not followed, presumably due to a mismatch with actual clinical practices in Japan.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6831-6839
Number of pages9
JournalSupportive Care in Cancer
Volume29
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Chemotherapy
  • Febrile neutropenia
  • G-CSF
  • Guidelines
  • Supportive care
  • Surveillance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A questionnaire survey on evaluation for penetration and compliance of the Japanese Guideline on Febrile Neutropenia among hematology-oncology physicians and surgeons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this